Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,273,513 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Southern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.850. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Southern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Southern Europe corresponds to an increase of 89.8 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,027 compared to $36,631, a difference of 31.1%), median household income ($91,605 compared to $70,539, a difference of 29.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,486 compared to $80,005, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,902 compared to $53,847, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,484 compared to $47,015, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 45.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 42.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 77.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 20.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 43.4%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 37.2%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.75%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.76%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.5%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 45.2%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.45%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 39.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.8%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.0%).