Indian (Asian) vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,029,683 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $80,005, a difference of 49.4%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $70,539, a difference of 49.2%), and per capita income ($53,874 compared to $36,631, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $47,015, a difference of 23.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $53,847, a difference of 30.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 74.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 61.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 111.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 51.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 37.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 68.7%), single father households (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 62.2%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 48.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 90.9%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 88.1%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 79.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (89.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 87.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 69.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.1%).