Comanche vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,765,943 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.277. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 21.9 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $103,507, a difference of 20.7%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $105,839, a difference of 19.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $96,525, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $51,421, a difference of 8.2%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $38,992, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $61,244, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czech communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 49.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 48.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 45.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 31.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.5%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.25%), family households (63.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 48.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.8%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czech communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 35.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.6%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 13.3%).