Immigrants from Guyana vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,788,058 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Guyana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guyana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guyana corresponds to a decrease of 21.6 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 36.1%), householder income under 25 years ($55,726 compared to $47,015, a difference of 18.5%), and median female earnings ($40,773 compared to $35,003, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,495 compared to $53,847, a difference of 4.9%), median family income ($92,513 compared to $86,852, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,186 compared to $83,943, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 34.0%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 28.6%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 61.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 41.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 60.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 45.8%), births to unmarried women (35.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 22.0%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.6% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 212.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 122.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 91.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 28.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 63.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 91.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 90.8%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 79.8%), hearing disability (2.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 72.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.6%).