Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,423,444 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to an increase of 3.8 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $47,015, a difference of 13.3%), median household income ($76,784 compared to $70,539, a difference of 8.8%), and wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($88,267 compared to $86,852, a difference of 1.6%), median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $46,368, a difference of 2.4%), and median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $35,003, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 44.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 34.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty (15.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 85.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 38.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 16.3%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and family households (67.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (43.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.20, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.62%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 87.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and college, under 1 year (57.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (40.3% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 58.3%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.38%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.2%).