Comanche vs Salvadoran Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,133,123 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Salvadorans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 29.9 Salvadorans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $55,412, a difference of 16.6%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $82,449, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $94,842, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $48,646, a difference of 0.92%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $38,858, a difference of 2.0%), and median earnings ($41,519 compared to $42,912, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 27.9%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.38%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 34.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.5% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.50%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.090%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 81.7%), high school diploma (87.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and college, under 1 year (61.4% compared to 57.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.10%), bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 51.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 39.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.7%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 13.5%).