Comanche vs American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,752,175 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Americans within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.059% in Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 59.5 Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and American communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 11.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $90,536, a difference of 5.5%), and median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $50,761, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $35,777, a difference of 0.32%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $55,527, a difference of 1.1%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $39,039, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and American communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.6%), male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and family poverty (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.69%), single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and single male poverty (16.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 55.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and American communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (44.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 7.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and associate's degree (39.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.4% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.10%), bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and American communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 49.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.58%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability (14.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.3%).