Comanche vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,439,637 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.176. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 7.5 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $47,284, a difference of 24.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $100,435, a difference of 17.1%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $103,010, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $49,267, a difference of 3.7%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $40,060, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.0%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.5% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 0.69%), currently married (45.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (63.5% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 47.4%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 39.6%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 27.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 9.3%).