Comanche vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,649,066 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.4%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $35,999, a difference of 5.8%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $33,775, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $47,729, a difference of 0.99%), median earnings ($41,519 compared to $40,270, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $53,060, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 12.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.4%), receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 31.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.29%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.1%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.17%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.7%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.9% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (91.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 50.7%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.3%).