Comanche vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,777,298 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 21.7 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $65,874, a difference of 19.9%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $95,293, a difference of 7.6%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $78,930, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $48,137, a difference of 0.13%), median earnings ($41,519 compared to $41,969, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $83,575, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 19.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.6%), single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.31%), male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.5% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.27%), family households (63.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.0%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.59%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.6%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 32.7%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 3.3%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.1%).