Comanche vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,748,948 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 27.5 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $128,140, a difference of 56.0%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $111,519, a difference of 51.2%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $56,709, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $71,567, a difference of 30.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $62,083, a difference of 30.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 69.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 63.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.15%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 23.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 55.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 45.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.22%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and family households (63.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 81.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 76.7%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 69.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.040%), 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and 11th grade (91.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 79.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.4%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 11.3%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 16.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.2%).