French vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
French
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
French
Chippewa
5,755
SOCIAL INDEX
55.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
169th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in French Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,654,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.471. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.115% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 114.9 Chippewa.
French vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,350 compared to $46,368, a difference of 19.4%), per capita income ($43,685 compared to $36,631, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,824 compared to $83,943, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $47,015, a difference of 9.0%), median female earnings ($38,457 compared to $35,003, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $53,847, a difference of 10.8%).
Income Metric | French | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,685 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Average $102,368 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,468 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,296 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,350 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,457 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,230 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,665 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $99,824 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $59,656 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Excellent 25.0% |
French vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.0%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 36.7%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.5%), single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and single male poverty (14.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.5%).
Poverty Metric | French | Chippewa |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.5% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.8% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.7% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
French vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 63.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 37.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.7%).
Unemployment Metric | French | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.9% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Poor 5.7% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
French vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | French | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.9% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 42.1% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 81.3% |
French vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (64.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | French | Chippewa |
Family Households | Fair 64.0% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.0% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.4% | Tragic 42.6% |
French vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 27.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.53%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | French | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 7.6% |
French vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.8%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.060%), 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and 8th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | French | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.4% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.9% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.4% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Poor 36.5% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
French vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Disability Metric | French | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 23.9% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |