Barbadian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,949,722 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.684. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.166% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to an increase of 165.7 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 31.7%), median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $35,003, a difference of 17.9%), and per capita income ($42,406 compared to $36,631, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,163 compared to $53,847, a difference of 0.59%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $83,943, a difference of 7.5%), and median family income ($93,919 compared to $86,852, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 25.4%), single female poverty (21.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.98%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 59.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.44%), female unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 41.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 43.1%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.60%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 176.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 93.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 22.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 49.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 71.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 58.8%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (56.0% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 0.58%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 81.3%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 58.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.83%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.8%).