Comanche vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,442,085 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.551. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.066% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 65.5 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 9.7%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $38,391, a difference of 7.6%), and median earnings ($41,519 compared to $44,118, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $48,691, a difference of 2.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $84,235, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $56,615, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.0%), single female poverty (25.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.0%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.040%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 19.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.7%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 11th grade (91.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and high school diploma (87.9% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.4%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.1%), and male disability (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.2%).