Immigrants from Mexico vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,706,057 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to an increase of 9.0 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $36,631, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $47,015, a difference of 7.2%), and median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $35,003, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,910 compared to $83,943, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,809 compared to $80,005, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 39.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 28.0%), and single father poverty (16.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (34.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 47.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 24.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (31.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 18.2%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and family households (69.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.7%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.9%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 122.8%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.9%), and professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 50.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.4%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.75%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%).