Comanche vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,079,493 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.761. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.114% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 113.6 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $61,000, a difference of 11.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $50,691, a difference of 6.7%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $75,574, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $35,477, a difference of 0.52%), median earnings ($41,519 compared to $41,133, a difference of 0.94%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $37,464, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 18.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and family poverty (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.62%), receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 31.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.7%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.5% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 0.81%), family households (63.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.23%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.6%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 23.6%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and female disability (14.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.4%).