German vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,045,444 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Germans corresponds to an increase of 13.5 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,224 compared to $83,943, a difference of 19.4%), median male earnings ($54,974 compared to $46,368, a difference of 18.6%), and median household income ($83,358 compared to $70,539, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,804 compared to $47,015, a difference of 8.1%), median female earnings ($37,986 compared to $35,003, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,730 compared to $53,847, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 50.6%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 46.8%), and male poverty (10.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.2%), single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 67.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 45.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (44.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.7%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 33.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.09 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 41.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.8%), no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and bachelor's degree (36.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 21.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and female disability (12.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 8.1%).