Comanche vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,193,473 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 33.2 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $50,575, a difference of 32.8%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $115,230, a difference of 30.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $111,286, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $53,294, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $42,446, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 36.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 34.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.94%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.19%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 68.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 59.5%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 35.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.5%), and ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 12.0%).