Comanche vs Pueblo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,690,141 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pueblo within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.910% in Pueblo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 909.8 Pueblo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 21.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $68,910, a difference of 19.2%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $32,012, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $52,930, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $45,018, a difference of 5.6%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $32,564, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 86.0%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 53.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 9.7%), single female poverty (25.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 46.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 35.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 46.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 30.4%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.2%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households (63.5% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 26.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 24.9%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and associate's degree (39.9% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 17.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.21%), female disability (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.1%).