Danish vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Danish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Danes

Chippewa

Excellent
Fair
8,781
SOCIAL INDEX
85.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
48th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Danish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,395,035 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Danish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Danes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.427% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Danes corresponds to an increase of 426.5 Chippewa.
Danish Integration in Chippewa Communities

Danish vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Danish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,619 compared to $83,943, a difference of 25.8%), median household income ($87,676 compared to $70,539, a difference of 24.3%), and wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,730 compared to $35,003, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,041 compared to $47,015, a difference of 12.8%), and median earnings ($46,392 compared to $40,287, a difference of 15.1%).
Danish vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricDanishChippewa
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,095
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,900
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,676
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Average
$46,392
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,246
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,730
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$53,041
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,221
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,619
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,117
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
31.0%
Excellent
25.0%

Danish vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Danish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 62.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 56.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 19.2%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 27.7%).
Danish vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricDanishChippewa
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
14.7%

Danish vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Danish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 86.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 56.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.6%).
Danish vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricDanishChippewa
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
7.0%

Danish vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Danish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (44.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Danish vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricDanishChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.3%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
79.9%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.7%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
81.3%

Danish vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Danish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 48.6%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 44.2%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.83%), family households (66.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.5%).
Danish vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricDanishChippewa
Family Households
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.1%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.5%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
42.6%

Danish vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Danish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 43.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.5% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.2%).
Danish vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricDanishChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
63.3%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.6%

Danish vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Danish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.4%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 25.8%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Danish vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricDanishChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.5%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.8%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.7%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.1%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Danish vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Danish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.3%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.8%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 12.3%).
Danish vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricDanishChippewa
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%