Comanche vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,862,800 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.655. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.132% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 132.1 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $49,152, a difference of 11.7%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $50,655, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($73,747 compared to $73,392, a difference of 0.48%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $86,301, a difference of 0.60%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $81,483, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 39.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 37.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.9%), female poverty (16.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and poverty (15.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.4%), male unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 7.3%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households (63.5% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.030%), currently married (45.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.30%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 47.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 45.6%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.46%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 9.0%).