Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,448,591 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to a decrease of 9.2 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 19.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $47,015, a difference of 16.4%), and median household income ($80,722 compared to $70,539, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $53,847, a difference of 2.9%), median family income ($94,665 compared to $86,852, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,208 compared to $83,943, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.6%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 25.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), poverty (15.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and male poverty (14.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 50.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), male unemployment (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 45.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.3%), births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 38.0%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.89%), married-couple households (43.1% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (63.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 172.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 94.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 22.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 47.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 71.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 92.3%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 35.5%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (56.6% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 1.6%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 120.4%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 64.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.54%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.3%).