Comanche vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,950,004 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 12.7 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $119,496, a difference of 45.5%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $105,262, a difference of 42.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $122,343, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $58,239, a difference of 22.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $70,238, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 56.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 51.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.70%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 45.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 37.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.25%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 85.3%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 84.6%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 69.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 66.6%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.8%).