Comanche vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,293,236 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.185% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 184.7 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $119,756, a difference of 45.8%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $105,335, a difference of 42.8%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $54,264, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $57,931, a difference of 21.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $69,174, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 54.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 50.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 21.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 48.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.61%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.72%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 47.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 96.6%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 90.4%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 75.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 69.5%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 55.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.3%).