Comanche vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
Laotians
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,972,430 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.067% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 66.7 Laotians.
Comanche vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $111,051, a difference of 29.4%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $94,990, a difference of 28.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $104,993, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $54,369, a difference of 14.4%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $42,133, a difference of 18.1%).
Income Metric | Comanche | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Poor 26.4% |
Comanche vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 43.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 40.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 22.6%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Comanche vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.3%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | Laotian |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Comanche vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Good 82.9% |
Comanche vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 29.0%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | Laotian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Comanche vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Comanche vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 46.9%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.080%), 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and 6th grade (97.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Comanche vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 45.8%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.4%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 8.0%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Excellent 2.4% |