Comanche vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,054,505 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.958. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.396% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 395.5 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $103,472, a difference of 20.6%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $106,541, a difference of 20.3%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $87,557, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $50,923, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $61,177, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.2%), and single female poverty (25.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 22.0%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.56%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 44.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.8%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.0%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.5%), and ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.3%).