Immigrants from Cambodia vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,898,210 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to an increase of 1.9 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,304 compared to $70,539, a difference of 18.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,537 compared to $83,943, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,533 compared to $80,005, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,580 compared to $53,847, a difference of 6.9%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and per capita income ($40,434 compared to $36,631, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 38.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 30.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 79.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 40.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 22.6%), single father households (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (65.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.93%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 113.7%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and bachelor's degree (34.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.27%), college, 1 year or more (55.4% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and college, under 1 year (61.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 59.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 35.7%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.15%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.2%).