Comanche vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,317,633 people shows no correlation between the proportion of British within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 0.1 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and British communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $106,264, a difference of 23.9%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $108,705, a difference of 22.8%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $46,571, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $51,477, a difference of 8.3%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $39,772, a difference of 11.5%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and British communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 38.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 43.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and British communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.6%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 19.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.60%), family households (63.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 35.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 2.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and British communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 42.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.1%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and British communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 11.2%).