Comanche vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,382,221 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.233. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.081% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 81.1 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $48,027, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $103,486, a difference of 26.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $107,775, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $61,902, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $54,484, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 32.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and family poverty (11.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.90%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 18.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 27.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 42.5%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 37.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.14%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 37.4%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.5%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.2%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 13.0%).