Blackfeet vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,310,527 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.366% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 365.9 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,402 compared to $46,368, a difference of 4.4%), median household income ($73,509 compared to $70,539, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($41,822 compared to $40,287, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,029 compared to $53,847, a difference of 0.34%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $80,005, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 53.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.4%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.91%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.11%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 23.6%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and bachelor's degree (31.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.67%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.98%).