Blackfeet vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Blackfeet
Chippewa
1,951
SOCIAL INDEX
17.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
279th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Blackfeet Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,310,527 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.366% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 365.9 Chippewa.
![Blackfeet Integration in Chippewa Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/blackfeet-vs-chippewa/blackfeet-vs-chippewa-community-integration.webp)
Blackfeet vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,402 compared to $46,368, a difference of 4.4%), median household income ($73,509 compared to $70,539, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($41,822 compared to $40,287, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,029 compared to $53,847, a difference of 0.34%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $80,005, a difference of 1.9%).
![Blackfeet vs Chippewa Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/blackfeet-vs-chippewa/blackfeet-vs-chippewa-income.webp)
Income Metric | Blackfeet | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,695 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,717 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,509 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,822 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,402 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,864 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,603 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,531 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,595 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,029 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.2% | Excellent 25.0% |
Blackfeet vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
![Blackfeet vs Chippewa Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/blackfeet-vs-chippewa/blackfeet-vs-chippewa-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Blackfeet | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.3% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.1% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Blackfeet vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 53.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
![Blackfeet vs Chippewa Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/blackfeet-vs-chippewa/blackfeet-vs-chippewa-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Blackfeet | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.2% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Blackfeet vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.40%).
![Blackfeet vs Chippewa Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/blackfeet-vs-chippewa/blackfeet-vs-chippewa-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Blackfeet | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.0% | Tragic 81.3% |
Blackfeet vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.4%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.91%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
![Blackfeet vs Chippewa Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/blackfeet-vs-chippewa/blackfeet-vs-chippewa-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Blackfeet | Chippewa |
Family Households | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.8% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.2% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.9% | Tragic 42.6% |
Blackfeet vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.11%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
![Blackfeet vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/blackfeet-vs-chippewa/blackfeet-vs-chippewa-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Blackfeet | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.6% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.4% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Blackfeet vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 23.6%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and bachelor's degree (31.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.40%).
![Blackfeet vs Chippewa Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/blackfeet-vs-chippewa/blackfeet-vs-chippewa-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Blackfeet | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.0% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.1% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.1% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.1% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.6% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.3% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.5% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Blackfeet vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.67%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.98%).
![Blackfeet vs Chippewa Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/blackfeet-vs-chippewa/blackfeet-vs-chippewa-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Blackfeet | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.8% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |