Nonimmigrants vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,102,023 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to an increase of 2.9 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($79,429 compared to $70,539, a difference of 12.6%), median male earnings ($52,170 compared to $46,368, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,448 compared to $83,943, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,348 compared to $47,015, a difference of 5.0%), median female earnings ($37,024 compared to $35,003, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,426 compared to $53,847, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 20.4%), male poverty (12.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 20.3%), and receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.19%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 50.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 26.4%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.7%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and bachelor's degree (34.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%).