Costa Rican vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,337,683 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.476. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.112% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 111.6 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($87,262 compared to $70,539, a difference of 23.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $83,943, a difference of 22.4%), and per capita income ($44,090 compared to $36,631, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $47,015, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $35,003, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 38.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 37.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 70.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 31.7%), births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 30.4%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and family households (65.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.87%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.14%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.6%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 42.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 39.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.1%).