Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Comanche
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Comanche

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Poor
Fair
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Comanche Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,753,367 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.132% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 131.6 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Comanche Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 9.6%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $78,682, a difference of 6.7%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $94,472, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $48,749, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $57,114, a difference of 4.0%), and median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $50,298, a difference of 4.3%).
Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricComancheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,088
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,556
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Tragic
$73,747
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,519
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,202
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,661
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,518
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,152
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$85,787
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,922
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
22.8%

Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.1%), single female poverty (25.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.74%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricComancheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.0%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.6%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.9%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.9%

Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 29.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.1%).
Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricComancheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.4%

Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricComancheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.0%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.7%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.4%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.5%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.2%
Tragic
82.0%

Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.7%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (63.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricComancheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.5%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Poor
32.9%

Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.25%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricComancheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
89.9%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.5%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Fair
6.2%

Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 52.6%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.69%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricComancheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Fair
97.0%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Fair
95.8%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.9%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.4%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.4%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.9%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Poor
1.7%

Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.9%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.2%), and male disability (14.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.2%).
Comanche vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricComancheImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.3%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.7%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.5%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Average
2.5%