Arapaho vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,256,247 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.069% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 69.4 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $36,631, a difference of 13.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $80,005, a difference of 11.6%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $35,003, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,965 compared to $70,539, a difference of 3.8%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $86,852, a difference of 5.8%), and wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 34.0%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 97.9%), male unemployment (11.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 67.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.64 compared to 3.20, a difference of 13.6%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.8% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.7%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.66%).