Comanche vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,701,034 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.126. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 17.7 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $53,154, a difference of 39.6%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $120,487, a difference of 36.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $116,328, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 11.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $54,389, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $67,626, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Russian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 48.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 47.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.1%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 33.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.1%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 31.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.12, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.6%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 79.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 62.5%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 44.9%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 10.1%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 13.6%).