Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Chippewa
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,555,814 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.937. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.311% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 310.6 Chippewa.
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $36,631, a difference of 21.1%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $86,852, a difference of 20.3%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $46,368, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $47,015, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $35,003, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $53,847, a difference of 9.6%).
Income Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,256 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $72,193 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $61,663 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,349 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,543 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,205 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,248 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $69,068 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,774 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,121 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.1% | Excellent 25.0% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 106.3%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 81.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 71.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 19.7%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 23.8%).
Poverty Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.7% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 34.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 58.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 55.6%), and male unemployment (10.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.1% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 40.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 8.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.4% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.6% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.7% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.1% | Tragic 81.3% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 23.7%), currently married (36.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.8%), family households (67.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chippewa |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.9% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.53 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.8% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 42.6% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 65.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.0% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.3%), associate's degree (31.8% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 28.2%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
Education Level Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.6% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.5% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.8% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.1% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 29.6%), ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (14.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.3%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability (14.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.4%).
Disability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 36.0% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.7% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.6% |