Comanche vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,784,679 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.397. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.054% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 54.2 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $52,391, a difference of 37.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $117,814, a difference of 37.3%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $121,202, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $54,266, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $68,037, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 48.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 47.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.0%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 33.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.6%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 75.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 69.8%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 52.8%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 49.1%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.9%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 13.2%).