Comanche vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,837,093 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 5.6 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $103,705, a difference of 20.9%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $89,100, a difference of 20.8%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $106,453, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $53,680, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $40,297, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 29.1%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 34.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 20.1%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.3%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.52%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 29.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.6%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and 6th grade (97.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 29.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.7%).