Apache vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,514,836 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.625. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.477% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to an increase of 477.3 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,395 compared to $47,015, a difference of 5.1%), per capita income ($34,886 compared to $36,631, a difference of 5.0%), and median family income ($84,451 compared to $86,852, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,429 compared to $46,368, a difference of 0.13%), median earnings ($40,388 compared to $40,287, a difference of 0.25%), and median female earnings ($34,895 compared to $35,003, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 64.6%), single male poverty (21.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 31.8%), and family poverty (14.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 1.6%), single female poverty (27.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 35.0%), male unemployment (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (60.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.1%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and average family size (3.46 compared to 3.20, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.010%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.7%), associate's degree (36.2% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and bachelor's degree (28.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age over 75 (53.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (14.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and male disability (14.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.0%).