Immigrants from Panama vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,820,672 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.729. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.393% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 393.5 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($80,873 compared to $70,539, a difference of 14.6%), per capita income ($41,853 compared to $36,631, a difference of 14.3%), and median earnings ($45,198 compared to $40,287, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $53,847, a difference of 5.8%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $47,015, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 33.4%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 29.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 72.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 28.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 31.4%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 24.7%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (44.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 55.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 33.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.9%), master's degree (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and bachelor's degree (36.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.4%).