Comanche vs Hopi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,136,780 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Hopi within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.448% in Hopi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 447.8 Hopi.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 25.1%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $31,177, a difference of 22.2%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $77,188, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $46,978, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $33,932, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $50,925, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 71.7%), receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 62.5%), and male poverty (13.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 1.6%), single female poverty (25.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 108.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 95.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 90.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 38.4%), currently married (45.0% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 23.1%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (63.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 34.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 26.1%), associate's degree (39.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 272.5%), male disability (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 0.51%), ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%).