Central American vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,948,143 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $47,015, a difference of 11.9%), median household income ($78,803 compared to $70,539, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $83,943, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $46,368, a difference of 3.7%), median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $35,003, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $53,847, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 30.3%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 62.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 16.1%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.3% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.24%), married-couple households (43.9% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 107.7%), high school diploma (82.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and college, under 1 year (57.7% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 59.4%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 46.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.79%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.3%).