Comanche vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,907,583 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.316. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 25.8 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 22.8%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $48,535, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $50,757, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($41,519 compared to $41,119, a difference of 0.97%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $36,414, a difference of 2.1%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $37,254, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 47.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 42.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.6%), male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.1%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.090%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 91.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 53.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 11.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 44.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.6%), and college, under 1 year (61.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.26%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and associate's degree (39.9% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 39.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.8%).