Comanche vs Cajun Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,993,970 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 29.1 Cajuns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 35.3%), median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $52,325, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $51,397, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $82,393, a difference of 0.29%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $37,527, a difference of 1.5%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $87,157, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 24.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 21.1%), and single female poverty (25.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 87.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 11.6%), currently married (45.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.48%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 21.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 19.8%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.7%).