Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Poland
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Poland

Pima

Good
Poor
7,802
SOCIAL INDEX
75.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
104th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Poland Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,073,724 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to an increase of 45.6 Pima.
Immigrants from Poland Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,979 compared to $30,644, a difference of 50.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,319 compared to $73,365, a difference of 44.9%), and median household income ($90,549 compared to $63,262, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $51,503, a difference of 7.7%), median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $35,326, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,041 compared to $50,539, a difference of 20.8%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PolandPima
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,979
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,570
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,549
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,633
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,452
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,630
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,474
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,065
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,319
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,041
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 147.6%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 132.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 117.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 6.5%), single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 43.3%), and single female poverty (18.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 63.8%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PolandPima
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 148.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 115.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 111.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.6%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PolandPima
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 10.2%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PolandPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.6%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.3%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 107.1%), births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 78.2%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.37%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.9%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PolandPima
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.2%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.9%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 35.5%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 33.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.6%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PolandPima
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.6%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.6%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (39.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 67.9%), master's degree (15.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 66.0%), and associate's degree (47.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.21%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PolandPima
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Average
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Good
95.8%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.6%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Good
89.5%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.2%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.1%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.0%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Good
15.4%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 77.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 63.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.1%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PolandPima
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%