Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Nicaragua
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Nicaragua

Pima

Fair
Poor
3,407
SOCIAL INDEX
31.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
221st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Nicaragua Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,364,130 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.717. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.186% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to an increase of 186.2 Pima.
Immigrants from Nicaragua Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,065 compared to $30,644, a difference of 24.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,108 compared to $73,365, a difference of 21.5%), and median household income ($76,784 compared to $63,262, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $35,326, a difference of 2.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,914 compared to $82,821, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,085 compared to $50,539, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaPima
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,065
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,267
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,784
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,737
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,482
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,023
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,266
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,914
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$89,108
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,085
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Pima communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 71.0%), family poverty (11.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 65.2%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.5%), receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 24.5%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaPima
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.9%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 160.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 105.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 96.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.3%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaPima
Unemployment
Average
5.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.9%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.7%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 57.1%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 35.6%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%), divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaPima
Family Households
Exceptional
67.5%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.5%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.0%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 42.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 9.1%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaPima
No Vehicles Available
Good
9.9%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.4%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.3%), bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 37.6%), and associate's degree (40.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (88.1% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.1%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.9%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.6%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.4%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 60.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 60.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.7%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaPima
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%