Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Sweden
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Sweden

Pima

Excellent
Poor
9,195
SOCIAL INDEX
89.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
28th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Sweden Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,628,727 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to a decrease of 31.8 Pima.
Immigrants from Sweden Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $30,644, a difference of 81.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,318 compared to $73,365, a difference of 61.3%), and median household income ($100,699 compared to $63,262, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.1%), median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $35,326, a difference of 26.7%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 33.0%).
Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from SwedenPima
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$55,582
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$122,765
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,699
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,478
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,406
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,774
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,621
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$112,010
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$118,318
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,722
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 160.8%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 138.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 106.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 36.9%), and single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 40.4%).
Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from SwedenPima
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 165.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 134.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 129.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.3%).
Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from SwedenPima
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.3%).
Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from SwedenPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.9%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.2%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 101.1%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 80.4%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (62.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.9%).
Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from SwedenPima
Family Households
Tragic
62.5%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 14.9%).
Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from SwedenPima
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.3%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 119.2%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 117.2%), and bachelor's degree (47.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 102.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%).
Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from SwedenPima
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
72.1%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.8%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
47.0%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.9%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 84.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 68.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.86%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.0%).
Immigrants from Sweden vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from SwedenPima
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%