Hopi vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,309,005 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima within Hopi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hopi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hopi corresponds to an increase of 1.7 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hopi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,002 compared to $82,821, a difference of 10.4%), householder income under 25 years ($46,978 compared to $51,503, a difference of 9.6%), and wage/income gap (20.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($77,188 compared to $77,431, a difference of 0.32%), median male earnings ($42,060 compared to $42,357, a difference of 0.71%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,925 compared to $50,539, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hopi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (27.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 84.0%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 60.8%), and single male poverty (27.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.72%), child poverty under the age of 5 (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hopi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 57.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 46.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (13.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hopi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (66.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (71.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age > 16 (58.4% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hopi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.6%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and average family size (3.60 compared to 3.75, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.1%), births to unmarried women (50.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (36.5% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (49.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (49.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hopi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.0%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and associate's degree (34.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 336.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 28.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability (13.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.1%).