Chilean vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,795,312 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.617% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 617.0 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $30,644, a difference of 51.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $73,365, a difference of 45.3%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $63,262, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $51,503, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $35,326, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $82,821, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 130.7%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 117.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 98.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 6.4%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 38.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 48.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 167.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 118.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 114.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 88.4%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 67.8%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 42.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 83.1%), bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 77.4%), and associate's degree (49.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.0% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.090%), 8th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 75.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.1%).