Central American Indian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,204,657 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.259% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 259.5 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,699 compared to $30,644, a difference of 23.0%), median household income ($74,847 compared to $63,262, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $73,365, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $82,821, a difference of 0.57%), median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $35,326, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $50,539, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (21.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 46.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 44.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.0%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 111.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 91.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 56.6%), births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 32.1%), and married-couple households (43.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.52%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (32.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 40.2%), associate's degree (40.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 35.1%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (88.2% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 42.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.68%), male disability (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%).